<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumour: Sega sign a deal with ATI to use DirectX 10.1 in upcoming game?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/</link>
	<description>Sega Nerds is the only place you need to visit to get all your Sega news, reviews, previews and more!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63951</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63951</guid>
		<description>I think its just that Sega and EA will have PC games sponsored by ATI. 

You know theres AMD ads in Outrun 2, AMD now owns ATI. So i'm sure their going to have something similar to what Nivdia does with the "How its meant to be played" shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its just that Sega and EA will have PC games sponsored by ATI. </p>
<p>You know theres AMD ads in Outrun 2, AMD now owns ATI. So i&#8217;m sure their going to have something similar to what Nivdia does with the &#8220;How its meant to be played&#8221; shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phos</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63884</link>
		<dc:creator>Phos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63884</guid>
		<description>If this was a PC game, I can't imagine why Sega would go to ATI, considering Direct X is Microsoft's thing.  If it was just Sega, then I'd say it's for a new Arcade board, but considering EA is also in on it, it makes no sense, EA is out for money, and there's not much money in the Arcades for a U.S. developer.  Is it possible the deals are for different things entirely?  I can't imagine what EA wants with ATI, Direct X belongs to Microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this was a PC game, I can&#8217;t imagine why Sega would go to ATI, considering Direct X is Microsoft&#8217;s thing.  If it was just Sega, then I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s for a new Arcade board, but considering EA is also in on it, it makes no sense, EA is out for money, and there&#8217;s not much money in the Arcades for a U.S. developer.  Is it possible the deals are for different things entirely?  I can&#8217;t imagine what EA wants with ATI, Direct X belongs to Microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63856</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63856</guid>
		<description>The Xbox 360 doesn't even have AA on half the titles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Xbox 360 doesn&#8217;t even have AA on half the titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63850</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63850</guid>
		<description>(ps. i am of course joking, just in case i sounded rude lol)

apologies for the triple post, just wanted to cover my ass with that &#62;_&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(ps. i am of course joking, just in case i sounded rude lol)</p>
<p>apologies for the triple post, just wanted to cover my ass with that &gt;_&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63848</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63848</guid>
		<description>ps. nathan, stop being so negative, your really killing the mood 'round these here parts :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps. nathan, stop being so negative, your really killing the mood &#8217;round these here parts :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63847</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63847</guid>
		<description>The problem with the idea of the Xbox360, is that while it does use a custom designed ATi card, its only DX9.0c compatible if memory serves. Not even a firmware update could bring it up to properly support all features of 10 without a framerate or compatability issue. Consoles are left in the dust on thsi one. 

Vista seems to be the platform of choice, but knowing nVidia, theyll opt in for something new, because nVidia always likes kicking ATi in the Teeth for something. Theyve got something up their sleeve. 

Also, with Blizzard apart of the deal, i can only imagine its pertinant for the new DiabloIII announcement, theyve been pussyfooting around the subject by providing easter eggs and crap like Runes oh so familiar to the Diablo universe within SC2 promotional shots. 
Or it could be WoW2 on the way, or hopefully, an optional graphics overhaul to WoW (thatd be sweet)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the idea of the Xbox360, is that while it does use a custom designed ATi card, its only DX9.0c compatible if memory serves. Not even a firmware update could bring it up to properly support all features of 10 without a framerate or compatability issue. Consoles are left in the dust on thsi one. </p>
<p>Vista seems to be the platform of choice, but knowing nVidia, theyll opt in for something new, because nVidia always likes kicking ATi in the Teeth for something. Theyve got something up their sleeve. </p>
<p>Also, with Blizzard apart of the deal, i can only imagine its pertinant for the new DiabloIII announcement, theyve been pussyfooting around the subject by providing easter eggs and crap like Runes oh so familiar to the Diablo universe within SC2 promotional shots.<br />
Or it could be WoW2 on the way, or hopefully, an optional graphics overhaul to WoW (thatd be sweet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shin</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63843</link>
		<dc:creator>Shin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63843</guid>
		<description>What about a lindbergh 2 with a crossfire configration that might be in preparation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a lindbergh 2 with a crossfire configration that might be in preparation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROJM</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63824</link>
		<dc:creator>ROJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63824</guid>
		<description>Well it isn't a rumour really considering the guy from Creative Assembly confirmed a DirectX game is being by sega. I wonder if it could be THE RITUALIST?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it isn&#8217;t a rumour really considering the guy from Creative Assembly confirmed a DirectX game is being by sega. I wonder if it could be THE RITUALIST?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63811</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63811</guid>
		<description>Well Nathan my darling, I did openly say that I didn't know much about DirectX.  Which is why I said they were "wild theories and speculations" and I was happy to be "educated" on the matter.  (Though prefer if not in such a hostile manner).

The whole point of the post is that it's rumoured that Sega might be utilising DirectX 10.1 in some future games.
So it has nothing to do with UAW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Nathan my darling, I did openly say that I didn&#8217;t know much about DirectX.  Which is why I said they were &#8220;wild theories and speculations&#8221; and I was happy to be &#8220;educated&#8221; on the matter.  (Though prefer if not in such a hostile manner).</p>
<p>The whole point of the post is that it&#8217;s rumoured that Sega might be utilising DirectX 10.1 in some future games.<br />
So it has nothing to do with UAW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROJM</title>
		<link>http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63810</link>
		<dc:creator>ROJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seganerds.com/2008/06/26/rumour-sega-sign-a-deal-with-ati-to-use-directx-101-in-upcoming-game/#comment-63810</guid>
		<description>Alright here's the link that suggested it was TOTAL WAR but apparently an update has been issued confirming it isn't TOTAL WAR using Direct x but a yet to be named Sega PC game.

http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/602835/rumour-control-empire-total-war-to-be-directx-10-only.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright here&#8217;s the link that suggested it was TOTAL WAR but apparently an update has been issued confirming it isn&#8217;t TOTAL WAR using Direct x but a yet to be named Sega PC game.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/602835/rumour-control-empire-total-war-to-be-directx-10-only.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/602835/rumour-control-empire-total-war-to-be-directx-10-only.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
